TL;DR About PHP FansOnly Patrons vs JustFans vs Dizzy
- PHP FansOnly Patrons is suited to businesses seeking a straightforward creator platform focused on subscriptions, locked content, and tips.
- JustFans offers broader publishing, messaging, payment, privacy, and media features for premium-content platforms.
- Dizzy supports a wider creator ecosystem with multiple monetization models, live streaming, video calls, communities, marketplace features, and AI tools.
- PHP FansOnly Patrons and JustFans use Laravel, PHP, and MySQL, while Dizzy uses PHP and MySQL. All three offer source-code customization, but their built-in features and infrastructure needs differ.
- Regular licenses range from $59 to $89, while extended licenses range from $199 to $299. Compare the required features, hosting, payment processing, customization, and ongoing maintenance before choosing.
PHP FansOnly Patrons, JustFans, and Dizzy all provide tools for creator monetization, but they differ in the breadth of features, payment options, technology, customization, and ongoing infrastructure requirements.
PHP FansOnly Patrons is built around subscriptions, paid posts, and tips, while JustFans provides a broader premium-content platform with more extensive publishing, messaging, payment, and media features. Dizzy takes a wider creator-platform approach, adding multiple monetization models, marketplace capabilities, communities, and live-streaming tools.
This guide compares the three scripts across features, technology, security, customization, and total cost of ownership to help you choose the one that best matches the platform you plan to build.
Overview of PHP FansOnly Patrons vs JustFans vs Dizzy
Before comparing each script in detail, the table below gives a quick view of their pricing, technology, monetization options, AI capabilities, mobile support, and customization scope.
| Criteria | PHP FansOnly Patrons | JustFans | Dizzy |
| Regular License | $89 | $79 | $59 |
| Extended License | $199 | $219 | $299 |
| Technology Stack | Laravel, PHP, MySQL | Laravel, PHP, MySQL | PHP, MySQL |
| Core Monetization | Subscriptions, locked content, tips | Subscriptions, paid content, tips | Subscriptions, paid content, tips, live monetization, marketplace |
| Payment Gateways | Multiple options | Multiple options | Multiple options |
| AI Capabilities | Not a core listed feature | AI-assisted content tools | AI content assistant |
| Live Streaming & Calls | Not a core feature | Live streaming | Live streaming, video calls |
| Creator Management | Core creator management | Advanced creator controls | Broader creator and platform management |
| Storage & Media | Standard media handling | Advanced media processing and cloud storage options | Media processing with external storage support |
| PWA / Mobile Support | PWA | PWA | PWA |
| Customization | Source-code customization | Source-code and extensive configuration | Source-code customization |
| Updates & Support | Included | Included | Included |
Buyer Reviews of PHP FansOnly Patrons vs JustFans vs Dizzy
On CodeCanyon, PHP FansOnly Patrons has a rating of 4.81/5 from 73 ratings, JustFans has a rating of 4.83/5 from 125 ratings, and Dizzy has a rating of 4.60/5 from 134 ratings. JustFans has the highest average rating, while Dizzy has the largest number of ratings.
Before choosing the script, check recent reviews for feedback on installation, documentation, bug fixes, feature limitations, and developer support. These details can help you assess what to expect after purchase, alongside the features, license terms, and technical requirements covered in this comparison.
Feature Comparison of PHP FansOnly Patrons vs JustFans vs Dizzy
The biggest differences between PHP FansOnly Patrons, JustFans, and Dizzy come down to how much functionality each provides for monetization, creator operations, platform administration, and AI-assisted workflows. The sections below break down those differences and what they mean when choosing a script for your business.
1. Creator Monetization
PHP FansOnly Patrons focuses on the core monetization models needed for a subscription-based creator platform, including monthly memberships, locked posts, and tips. JustFans adds more flexibility with monthly, biannual, and annual subscriptions, limited-time offers, tips, pay-to-unlock posts, and paid messages. Dizzy has the broadest monetization mix, supporting subscriptions, locked posts, PPV, tips, paid private messages, paid live streams, video calls, live gifts, marketplace products, campaigns, and referrals.
Verdict: Dizzy is the strongest choice for a platform that needs multiple creator revenue streams. JustFans is better suited to a premium-content platform with varied subscription and paid-content options, while PHP FansOnly Patrons works well for a simpler subscription and paid-content model.
2. Content Publishing and Engagement
PHP FansOnly Patrons supports text, image, audio, and video posts, along with likes, comments, direct messages, and notifications. It is suited to a straightforward content and subscriber interaction model, but it does not list live streaming as a core feature.
JustFans provides a broader publishing and engagement toolkit, including multiple media uploads, drafts, scheduled posts, galleries, Stories, polls, reels, comments, reactions, bookmarks, paid messages, and live streaming.
Dizzy also supports mixed-media publishing, Stories, reels, polls, scheduled and boosted posts, private media storage, communities, and live streaming. Its wider set of creator and community features makes it suitable for platforms that want more than a traditional subscription-content model.
Verdict: JustFans is a strong choice for content-heavy platforms with varied publishing and engagement tools. Dizzy is better suited to platforms that want to combine content with communities, live interaction, and broader creator activities. PHP FansOnly Patrons is the more focused option for businesses that mainly need subscriptions, paid content, and direct engagement.
3. Payment Gateway Support
PHP FansOnly Patrons supports Stripe, PayPal, and manual payments. JustFans provides a substantially broader payment selection, including Stripe, PayPal, Verotel, CCBill, CoinGate, Paystack, Razorpay, MercadoPago, Paddle, Mollie, Flutterwave, and others. Dizzy also supports a wide range of gateways, including Stripe, PayPal, CCBill, Razorpay, Paystack, Flutterwave, MercadoPago, NOWPayments, Epoch, and manual or bank payments.
Verdict: JustFans and Dizzy are the stronger choices when broad payment-gateway coverage is important. PHP FansOnly Patrons is more suitable when Stripe, PayPal, and manual payments cover the intended market. Gateway availability can still depend on country, business category, provider approval, and account configuration.
4. Creator Management
PHP FansOnly Patrons provides the core tools needed to manage creators, subscriptions, earnings, and platform fees. JustFans adds creator identity verification, subscription management, payouts, privacy controls, and creator-oriented profile and content settings. Dizzy extends creator management further with creator requests, moderators, agencies, communities, campaigns, marketplace sales, withdrawals, payouts, invoices, and tax configuration.
Verdict: Dizzy offers the broadest creator-management capabilities. JustFans is a strong middle ground for businesses building a premium-content platform, while PHP FansOnly Patrons is better suited to simpler creator operations.
5. Admin and Platform Management
PHP FansOnly Patrons provides an admin panel for managing users, creators, payments, platform fees, content, and core settings.JustFans provides a more extensive administrative environment with settings for SEO, social logins, referrals, geo-blocking, privacy, translations, themes, and payment and payout management.Dizzy provides broad administrative controls covering users, roles, moderators, content, communities, marketplaces, campaigns, transactions, withdrawals, taxes, gateways, storage, themes, languages, and platform settings.
Verdict: Dizzy and JustFans provide greater administrative depth than PHP FansOnly Patrons. Choose Dizzy when the platform will have multiple business models and operational areas; choose JustFans when the focus is a feature-rich premium-content platform.
6. AI Capabilities
PHP FansOnly Patrons does not list the AI-assisted creator tools offered by JustFans and Dizzy, making it a more straightforward option for businesses that do not need AI features as part of the core creator experience.
JustFans includes AI-powered assistance for tasks such as generating post descriptions and profile content, giving creators a simpler way to speed up routine content creation.
Dizzy goes further with an AI content assistant that supports templates, different tones, languages, actions, usage limits, and credits. Its Smart Creator Composer is designed to help creators generate and manage content within the platform.
Verdict: Dizzy offers the most extensive AI feature set, while JustFans provides useful AI assistance for everyday creator tasks. PHP FansOnly Patrons is better suited to a platform where AI is not a major product requirement.
Technology, Hosting and Scalability
| Factor | PHP FansOnly Patrons | JustFans | Dizzy |
| Media Processing | Laravel framework | FFmpeg, Coconut.co and background media processing | FFmpeg/FFprobe |
| Storage Options | Server storage | Local, Amazon S3, Wasabi, DigitalOcean Spaces, Cloudflare R2 and others | Server storage and S3-compatible storage such as Cloudflare R2 |
| Additional Infrastructure | Standard PHP/MySQL server requirements | Media processing, storage, queues and related services | FFmpeg, cron, SMTP, HTTPS and third-party services |
| Infrastructure Complexity | Lower | Higher | Higher |
| Best Suited For | Focused creator platforms | Media-heavy platforms | Platforms with broader media and live requirements |
Which One Fits Best?
PHP FansOnly Patrons is the simpler option if your platform has straightforward media and hosting requirements. JustFans requires more supporting infrastructure but gives businesses greater flexibility for media-heavy workloads. Dizzy also requires additional services, particularly where live features and media processing are part of the platform.
Scalability: None of the three should be labelled as inherently “more scalable” based on the script alone. Actual performance depends on server capacity, database optimization, caching, CDN and storage configuration, media processing, background jobs, traffic, and concurrent users.
Security, Privacy and Content Moderation
Account and Creator Verification
PHP FansOnly Patrons provides basic user and creator management, while JustFans adds creator identity verification, email 2FA, reCAPTCHA, and geo-blocking. Dizzy provides creator request management, user roles, and moderator controls, making it suitable for platforms with more complex creator operations.
Privacy and Content Protection
PHP FansOnly Patrons supports locked content and image watermarking. JustFans adds blurred previews, privacy settings, geo-blocking, and watermarking for paid and private content. Dizzy supports locked content, private media storage, and access controls.
Moderation
PHP FansOnly Patrons provides core administrative controls for managing users and content. JustFans offers more advanced moderation, including media and AI-assisted moderation, while Dizzy combines content moderation with broader user, creator, and moderator management.
Compliance also needs to be evaluated separately from the script’s built-in security features. Age and identity verification, creator release documentation, content moderation, record-keeping, and payment-processor requirements can vary by market and business model. JustFans includes features such as ID-check enforcement and release-form compliance, but businesses still need to assess the legal and payment requirements that apply to their own operation.
Which One Fits Best? JustFans is the strongest option when built-in privacy and moderation controls are a priority. Dizzy is better suited to platforms with broader creator and community operations, while PHP FansOnly Patrons fits a simpler paid-content model.
Customization and Source Code
Customization matters if you plan to change the platform’s workflows, branding, monetization rules, or integrations after launch. Since all three products provide access to their application code, the main differences come from their architecture, built-in configuration options, and the amount of development needed for custom requirements.
Source-Code Access
- PHP FansOnly Patrons: Laravel-based PHP application with source code available for modification.
- JustFans: Laravel-based application with source code and extensive built-in configuration options.
- Dizzy: PHP/MySQL application with source code that can be modified for custom requirements.
Branding and UI Customization
JustFans provides extensive built-in controls for themes, colors, layouts, languages, RTL/LTR support, and other interface settings. Dizzy also provides theme, design, color, and language controls. PHP FansOnly Patrons supports branding and interface changes, but its built-in configuration is more focused.
Custom Features and Integrations
JustFans and Dizzy are better starting points if you expect substantial changes because both already cover broader workflows, integrations, storage options, payment systems, and creator features. PHP FansOnly Patrons can also be extended through development, but businesses may need more custom work when moving beyond its core subscription and paid-content model.
Documentation, Updates and Support
All three products include future updates and a period of support with their licenses, but support generally covers product-related issues rather than custom development. Businesses planning significant modifications should therefore budget separately for developer time, testing, maintenance, and compatibility work after updates.
Which One Fits Best: JustFans is the strongest choice for businesses that want extensive configuration alongside a Laravel foundation. Dizzy is a strong alternative for broader creator-platform customization, while PHP FansOnly Patrons is better when the required platform stays close to its existing feature set.
Pricing and Total Cost of Ownership
The license price gives you the cost of the script itself, but it does not represent the full investment required to launch and operate a creator platform. The first distinction to understand is which license applies to your business model.
License Pricing
| Script | Regular License | Extended License |
| PHP FansOnly Patrons | $89 | $199 |
| JustFans | $79 | $219 |
| Dizzy | $59 | $299 |
The regular license is intended for an end product where users are not charged. The extended license applies when end users can be charged, making it the relevant option for a monetized creator platform.
Based on the extended license, PHP FansOnly Patrons has the lowest price at $199, followed by JustFans at $219 and Dizzy at $299. The regular-license prices follow a different order, with Dizzy at $59, JustFans at $79, and PHP FansOnly Patrons at $89.
Additional Costs After Purchase
The script license is only the starting point. Your total project cost can also include:
- Hosting and server resources: You need infrastructure capable of handling user accounts, creator activity, databases, and media traffic.
- Storage and media delivery: Image and video-heavy platforms may require additional cloud storage and CDN services as content volumes grow.
- Payment processing: Payment gateways charge their own transaction or processing fees, separate from the script license.
- Third-party services: Email delivery, media processing, live streaming, identity verification, and other integrations can add recurring costs.
- Customization and maintenance: Changes to the source code, new integrations, security updates, performance work, and ongoing maintenance can increase the long-term budget.
What This Means for Your Budget
A lower license price does not automatically mean a lower overall project cost. A cheaper script may require more customization or additional services to meet your requirements, while a higher-priced option may reduce development work if more of the required functionality is already available.
For that reason, compare the license price alongside infrastructure, third-party services, customization requirements, and expected maintenance costs before deciding which script provides the better fit for your business.
Which Creator PHP Script Should You Choose?
The right choice depends less on which script has the longest feature list and more on how closely its existing workflows match your business model.
PHP FansOnly Patrons makes sense when the platform mainly revolves around subscriptions, locked content, tips, and direct creator-to-user interaction. Its simpler scope can be an advantage if you do not need extensive marketplace, community, or live-streaming functionality.
JustFans is a stronger fit for a premium-content platform that needs more publishing options, messaging, payment gateways, privacy controls, media processing, and live interaction. Its Laravel-based architecture and broader configuration options also give businesses more room to adapt the platform.
Dizzy is the better choice when the platform needs multiple monetization channels and broader creator operations. Subscriptions, paid messages, live streaming, video calls, gifts, marketplace features, communities, campaigns, and AI tools make it suitable for a more extensive creator ecosystem.
FAQs About PHP FansOnly Patrons, JustFans and Dizzy
1. Which script supports the most payment gateways?
JustFans and Dizzy offer broader payment-gateway support than PHP FansOnly Patrons. JustFans supports gateways such as Stripe, PayPal, CCBill, Razorpay, Paystack, and others, while Dizzy supports Stripe, PayPal, CCBill, Razorpay, Paystack, and several regional options.
2. Which CodeCanyon creator script is best for an OnlyFans-style platform?
PHP FansOnly Patrons is suitable for platforms focused on subscriptions, locked content, and tips. JustFans is a better fit for businesses that need broader publishing, messaging, and privacy features. Dizzy suits platforms planning to combine subscriptions with live streaming, video calls, marketplace sales, and other creator revenue streams.
3. What are the ongoing costs of running a creator platform?
Beyond the license, you may need to pay for hosting, storage, CDN usage, payment processing, third-party services, maintenance, and custom development.
4. Can PHP FansOnly Patrons, JustFans, and Dizzy be customized?
Yes. All three provide source code that can be modified. The amount of development required depends on how far your requirements differ from the features already included in each script.
